Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluative  indicators dedicated to managers' behavior for appropriate  governance in sports federations. This research was carried out in quantitative & qualitative steps, C-OAR-SE Procedure used in order to design the questionnaire and identify indicators. In the first step, appropriate  governance indicators were identified through review of literature as well as interview with 29  raters through which 114 indicators were identified. In the second step, 11 expert raters expressed their ideas about the content validity of the questionnaire with CVI & CVR and 9 indicators were removed in this step. The reliability of the questionnaire was confiremed by using Comunality test and then handed out among 305 raters and the stakeholders of 8 selected federations. SPSS and SMART-PLS(SEM) was used to analyze the data. According to the results of this study, extracted indicators were stood in eight dimentions: transparency and accountability, participation, rule-oriented, responsibility, fight against corruption, ethic principal, control and monitoring and effectiveness. They could pridicted 0.773 percent of managers' behavior for appropriate governance. Results showed that Transparency and accountability dimensions were the most important one (β=4.886) and ethic principal was the least important (β=2.966) in explanation of appropriate governance concept in sport federations.

Keywords

Aktan C, Ozler H. Good Governance: A New Public Managerialism. Review of International Law and Politics. 2008; 4(14): 165-187.
Australian Sports Commission. Sports Governance Principles. Retrieved November 26, 2012, from http://www.ausport.gov.au.
H. Global Administrative Law: The Quest for Principles and Values. The European Journal of International Law. 2006; 17(1): 187-214.
Chelladurai P, Haggerty TR, Campbell L, Wall S. a factor analytic study of effectiveness criteria in intercollegiate athletics. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Science. 1981; 6(1): 81-86.
Chappelet J, Kübler-Mabbott B. The International Olympic Committee and the Olympic System The governance of world sport. Routledge Global Institutions the CUNY Graduate Center. New York. 2008; p: 1-230.
Chappelet JL, Mrkonjic M. Basic Indicators for Better Governance in International Sport (BIBGIS): An assessment tool for international sport governing bodies. Institute de hautes etudes en Administration publique Working Paper. 2013; 1: 1-55.
Council of the European Union. Principles of good governance in sport. Under the EU Work Plan for Sport for 2011-2014. Brussels. 1 October 2013; p: 1-32.
Devaney L. Good governance? Perceptions of accountability, transparency and effectiveness in Irish food risk governance”. Food Policy. 2016; 62: 1–10.
Ferkins L, Shilbury D. Developing board strategic capability in sport organizations: The national–regional governing relationship. Sport Management Review. 2010; 13: 235–254.
Freeburn L. National sporting organizations and the good governance principles of the Australian sports commission. Australian and New Zealand Sports Law Journal. 2010; 5: 43–80.
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis (5th Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2006; P: 1-75.
Hoye R, Cuskelly G. Sport governance. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann. Linacre House. Jordan Hill.UK. 2007; p: 1-204.
Hoye R, Nicholson M. Sport stadia governance. Sport Management Review. 2010; 13: 171–178.
International Olympic Committee. Basic universal principles of good governance of the Olympic and sports movement. Documents Seminar Autonomy of Olympic and Sport Movement, 11- 12 February 2008. P: 1-12.
Kleining G. Qualitativ-heuristische Sozialforschung. Hamburg, DE: Rolf Fechner Verlag. Qualitative-heuristic social research. 1995; P: 1-101.
Kordbache H, Mirzai F, Ebadi, Zahra. The development of good governance theory using the Nahj al-Balagha. Conference Nahj al-Balagha. 1391. Hamedan, Bu-Ali Sina University Press. [Persian]
Lam ETC. The Roles of Governance in Sport Organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management in Sport Studies. 2014; 2(2): 19-31.
laugblin FL,  andringa RC. Good governance for nonprofits: developing principles and policies for an effective board. American Management Association. New York. 2007. P: 1-207.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975; 28: 563-575.
Mydry A. Introduction to the theory of good governance. Quarterly Scientific Journal Journal of Social Welfare. 1395; 6(22): 261-286. [Persian]
Nahj al-Balagha.(1385). Translated by Mohammad Dashti, Qom, Cultural Research Institute of Amir Almomenin. 1385. P: 30-500. [Persian]
Parent MM. Stakeholder perceptions on the democratic governance of major sports events. Journal of Organizational Behavioral Management in Sport Studies. 2016; 19, 402–416.
Sameti M, Ranjbar H, Mohsen F. Analysis of the Effects of Good Governance on the Human Development Index: A Case Study of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Journal of Economic Growth and Development. 1390; 1(4): 183-223. [Persian]
Shilbury DA, Ferkins Lb, Smythe L. Sport governance encounters: Insights from lived experiences. Sport Management Review. 2013; 16: 349–363.
Shilbury DA, O’Boyle IA, Ferkins Lb. Towards a research agenda in collaborative sport governance. Sport Management Review. 2016; 367: 1–13.
Srdarnya KhU. Indicators and religious legitimacy of the people's government in Nahj al-Balagha, Pajohesh Namh Nahj al-Balagha. 1392; 1(1): 17-41. [Persian]
Srdarnya KhU, Shakeri H. Good governance explanation in Nahj field-oriented approach method, Pzhvhsh‌Namh Nahj al-Balagha. Journal of Legal Studies, University of Shiraz. 1392; 4: 3-21. [Persian]