Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 islamic azad university, hamedan branch

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran

Abstract

The aim of this research was the effect of organizational inertia on organizational hypocrisy with the mediator of Social Undermining and Working low in the Tehran Municipality Sports Organization. The research method is descriptive-correlational. The statistical population included all employees of Tehran Municipal sports organization. The statistical sample was estimated to be a sufficient number for Smart Pls Modeling software (215 people) and stratified sampling was random. The research instrument was a researched questionnaire from previous research for four variables and on a 5-point Likert scale. Content validity of the tool Verification was verified and approved using expert opinion, Reliability using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and construct validity using factor analysis. The results showed that Organizational inertia has a significant direct effect on organizational dichotomy, Social wear and a shortage of employees. The results of mediation hypotheses showed that the indirect effect of organizational inertia on organizational hypocrisy with the role of social intermediation and lack of work is also significant, even in the case of the mediator route; there was also a shorter work of direct effect. According to research findings, it can be said Although organizational inertia itself can lead to negative organizational behaviors such as hypocrisy But if the mediator and intervening variables are not controlled This effect can be much more intense.

Keywords

  1. Are the ‘principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others’, moral. Understanding moral sentiments Darwinian perspectives. 2014:43-58.
  2. Batson CD. Are the ‘principles in his nature, which interest him in the fortune of others’, moral. Understanding moral sentiments Darwinian perspectives. 2014:43-58.
  3. Bekhti M, Nazari S, Eidipour K. Relationship of Social Welfare with Professional Welfare of Football F ederation Employees with Mediation of Interpersonal Conflict. Sports Management Studies,. 2017;6(9):115 - 32 [Persian].
  4. Danaifar H, A AF, H S, S S, 1-20. p. An Anecdotal Examination of Employees in the Public Sector: Combined Research,. Organizational Behavior Studies, . 2016;5(4):1- 20 [Persian].
  5. Duffy MK, Scott KL, Shaw JD,  Tepper BJ, Aquino K. A social context model of envy and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal. 2012;55(3):643-66.
  6. Ebrahimi A. Income on Organizational Inertia and its Influential Factors in Iranian Public Sector Organizations. Chapter 4. Management of Governmental Organizations. 2015:101- 19 [Persian].
  7. Ghafari R, Rostamnia Y. Organizational inertia and social laziness; Bureaucratic Organizational Culture Cycles,. Public Administration Quarterly,. 2017;9(2):307-32 [Persian].
  8. Godkin L, Allcorn S. Overcoming organizational inertia: A tripartite model for achieving strategic organizational change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2008;8(1):82.
  9. Haag S. Organizational inertia as barrier to firms’ IT adoption–multidimensional scale development and validation. 2014.
  10. Hosseini, S., Aghaei, N., Elahi, A., Saffari, M. (2017). Studying Tehran Municipality Behavior with regard to Public Sports by Principles of Good Urban Governance. Scientific Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 4(4), 21-36.
  11. Hung D-F. Sustained competitive advantage and organizational inertia: the cost perspective of knowledge management. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2015;6(4):769-89.
  12. Hung D-F. Sustained competitive advantage and organizational inertia: the cost perspective of knowledge management. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2015;6(4):769-89.
  13. Ichino A, Riphahn RT. The effect of employment protection on worker effort: Absenteeism during and after probation. Journal of the European Economic Association. 2015;3(1):120-43.
  14. Imani P. A Survey on Social Welfare in Organizations Nowadays, Second International Conference on Challenges and Solutions, Shiraz, Conference Center of Conferences. 2014 [Persian].
  15. Investigating the effect of anomie feeling on communicative action. 2015;6(1):51- 70 [Persian].
  16. Johnson P, Duberley J. Anomie and culture management: reappraising Durkheim. Organization. 2011;18(4):563-84.
  17. khaiegelahi AA, Alipour Darvishi Z,  p-. Design of the Model of Social Wearing of Manpower and the Interpersonal Communication Outcomes, .  Management Researches in Iran. 2010;14(2):45 -66 [Persian].
  18. Mazlomi N, Salehi Sedghiani J, sefi Sadchiyan S. A Model of Organizational Anomy and Its Contributing Factors, . Quarterly Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies,. 2017;6(4):103-7 [Persian].
  19. Mazlomi N, Sefidchiyan S. Investigating the role of change capacity in the formation of organizational anomy with qualitative approach, . Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies,. 2015;4(2):1 - 26 [Persian].
  20. Mousavi SN,  S, A, M A. Identification and Prioritization of Organizational Anomie Creating Factors in Government Organizations Using Delphi Fassi Techniques,. Management of Government Organizations, . 2016;4(4):115 - 30 [Persian].
  21. Nazari S, Bakhit M, Eidipour K. he Effect of Social Wear on Organizational Performance of the General Directorate of Sports and Youth of Tehran with the role of mediation of occupational conflict, . Torganizational behavior management studies in sport,. 2017;4(14):69-76 [Persian].
  22. Nazari, S., Bakhit, M., Eydipour, K. (2017). influence of social undermining the functioning of the Directorate General of Youth and Sports Organization of Tehran province was the mediating role of job involvement. Scientific Journal Of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 4(2), 69-76. [Persian].
  23. Polites GL, Karahanna E. Shackled to the status quo: The inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system acceptance. MIS quarterly. 2012;36(1).
  24. Rahmanesaratsh H, Mazlomi N, Sefidchiyan S. Organizational Anomy: Dimensions of Concept, Incentives and Consequences, Marandiz Publications, Tehran, First Edition. 2017 [Persian].
  25. Rastegar A, Shul H, Sharafi V. The Role of the Performance Evaluation System in the Occurrence of Organizational Hypocrisy: The Effect of Organizational Climate Adjustment,. Journal of Organizational Behavior Studies,. 2017;6(2):27 -50 [Persian].
  26. Rezapand S, Tolaby O. rganizational Beingness Management, 2nd International Conference on Future Studies, Economic Management and Development, Mashhad, Torbat Heydarieh University. 2015 [Persian].
  27. Riphahn RT. Employment protection and effort among German employees. Economics Letters. 2014;85(3):353-7.
  28. Scott KL, Ingram A, Zagenczyk TJ, Shoss MK. Work–family conflict and social undermining behaviour: An examination of PO fit and gender differences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2015;88(1):203-18.
  29. Shahabi M, Jalilian H. Investigating the Relationship Between Inertia Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Organizational Innovation (Case Study: Western Gas and Oil Company), . Scientific Journal of Management and Human Resources in Oil Industry,. 2011;4(15):137 -58 [Persian].
  30. Wang P, Yang X-w, editors. A review of knowledge inertia: How can we explain the hindrance on individual innovation. International Academic Workshop on Social Science (IAW-SC-13); 2013: Atlantis Press.