Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Urmia university

2 Urmia University

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to the role of humble leadership style on the voice behavior of the employees of the Ministry of Sport and Youth with the intermediate role of psychological empowerment and psychological safety. This research is descriptive research was a correlation based on structural equations the statistical population of the study consisted of all employees of the Ministry of Sport and Youth, which was 890 people. The statistical sample of this study consists of 355 staff of the Ministry of Sport and Youth. To measure the variables, the Owens’s et al (2013) humble leadership, Liang’s et al (2012) voice behavior, Carmeli’s et al (2010) psychological safety and Spreitzer’s (1995) psychological empowerment questionnaires were used. That validity and reliability were confirmed. For data analysis, structural equations model were used by SMART PLS software. The research findings showed that humble leadership, both directly and indirectly through psychological empowerment and psychological safety affect the voice behavior of employees. Therefore, it is suggested to Ministry of Sport and Youth managers that in order to improve their employees voice behavior, using their appropriate leadership style, they will develop the fields of psychological empowerment and psychological safety.

Keywords

  1. Abasi sfanjani, H. Designing the model for commercialization of university research using structural equation modeling- partial least squares method (sem-pls). Iranian Journal of Trade Studies, 2017, 82: 33-65. (Persian).
  2. Amirkhani, T., Hadizadeh Moghadam, A.,  Azimi, S.S. Organizational Obstruction and its Reducing Factors: Studying the Effect of Psychological Empowerment, Innovation Context and Employee Voice in Organization. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 2017, 29: 117-134. (Persian).
  3. Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K., Christianson, M. Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. Greenberg, & M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations, 2009: 175-202.
  4. Azari, B., Seyedameri, M.H., Moharramzadeh M. The relationship between psychological empowerment and organizational learning in sport and youth offices in kermanshah province. Sport Physiology & Management Investigations, 2017, 9(1): 67-77. (Persian).
  5. Benesbordi, A., Smaeili Sani, M. The Study of the Transformational Leadership Effect on Human Resource Efficiency Based on the Mediator Role of Employees’ Psychological Empowerment (Case Study: Ministry of Sport and Youth). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2019, 5(20): 31-44. (Persian).
  6. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., Ziv, E. Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 2010, 22(3): 250–260.
  7. Cheng, Z. The influence Humble Leadership on the Employee Voice Behavior: The effects of Psychological safety and proactive personality. Journal of Business Economics, 2016, 11: 25-33.
  8. Chiaburu, D.S., Marinova, S.V., Van Dyne, L. Should I do it or not? An initial model of cognitive processes predicting voice behaviors. In L.T. Kane & M. R. Poweller (Eds.), Citizenship in the 21st Century: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. 2008.
  9. Detert, J.R., Edmondson, A. C. Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 2011, 54: 461- 488.
  10. Ding, W., Chang, P., Mi, S. He Influence of Humble Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: Psychological Security as a Mediator. 4th International Conference on Humanities Science, Management and Education Technology, 2019: 305-310.
  11. Doostar, M., Esmailzadeh, M., Hosseini, H. Studying the effect of ethical leadership on organizational silence, voice and employee's performance. Journal of Public Administration Perspective, 2017, 27: 63-83. (Persian).
  12. Edmondson, A. C., Kramer, R. M., Cook, K. S. Psychological safety, trust, and learning in organizations: A group-level lens. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, 2004, 10: 239-272.
  13. Gagne, M. A model of knowledge-sharing motivation, Human Resource Management, 2009, 48(4): 571-589.
  14. Ghanbari, S., Zandi, KH., Dehghan, A. Analyzing the Relationships of Authentic Leadership, Psychological Security and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Journal of Public Policy In Management, 2016, 7(22): 35-45. (Persian).
  15. Gong, Y., Cheung, S. Y., Wang, M., Huang, J. C. Unfolding the proactive process for creativity integration of the employee proactivity, information exchange, and psychological safety perspectives. Journal of Management, 2012, 38(5): 1611-1633.
  16. Hadizadeh, A., Azimi, S.S., Tehrani, M. Determining the Pattern of Impact of Structural Empowerment on Employees' Voice Behavior. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 2018, 32: 91-112. (Persian).
  17. Hu, Y., Zhu, L., Zhou, M., Li, J., Maguire, P., Sun, H., Wang. Exploring the Influence of Ethical Leadership on Voice Behavior: How Leader-Member Exchange, Psychological Safety and Psychological Empowerment Influence

 

  1. Employees’ Willingness to Speak Out. Front. Psychol, 2018, 9: 1-10.
  2. Ioannidou, E., Karagiorgos, T., Alexandris, K. Exploring the relationship of organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, psychological empowerment and job satisfaction with Leader-Member Exchange of section leaders and team leaders in summer children’s camps in Greece. International Journal of Sport Management, Recreation and Tourism, 2016, 22: 63-80.
  3. Jafari, M., Hosseini Nia, S.R. Impact of organizational silence on organizational citizenship behavior of employees of North Khorasan province sport and youth departments: moderating role of organizational justice. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 2019, 6(24): 71-82. (Persian).
  4. Jeung, C.W., Yoon, H.J. Leader humility and psychological empowerment: investigating contingencies. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2016, 31(7): 1122-1136.
  5. Jeung, C.W., Yoon, H.J. When leadership elicits voice: Evidence for a mediated moderation model. Journal of Management & Organization, 2017, 42: 1-22.
  6. Kluitenberg, S. Humble Leadership and Team Voice The Mediating Effects of Information Exchange, Team Psychological Safety, and Team-Efficacy. Master Thesis. Maastricht University. 2015.
  7. Li, J., Wu, L.Z., Liu, D., Kwan, H.K., Liu, J. Insiders maintain voice: A psychological safety model of organizational politics. Asia Pacific Journal of Managemen, 2014, 31(3): 853-874.
  8. Liang, J., Farh, C.I.C., and Farh, J.L. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad. Manag. J, 2012, 55: 71-92.
  9. Liu, CH. Does Humble Leadership Behavior Promote Employees’ Voice Behavior? A Dual Mediating Model. Open Journal of Business and Management, 2016, 4: 731-740.
  10. Liu, W., Mao, J., Chen, X. Leader Humility and Team Innovation: Investigating the Substituting Role of Task Interdependence and the Mediating Role of Team Voice Climate. Front. Psychol, 2017, 8:
  11. Malik, MS., Suleman, F., Ali, N., Arshad, F. An Empirical Analysis of Impact of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Engagement in International Nongovernment Organizations (INGO’s) of Punjab (Pakistan). Int J Econ Manag Sci, 2017, 6(4): 1-6.
  12. Malinen, O.P., Savolainen, H. The effect of perceived school climate and teacher efficacy in behavior management on job satisfaction and burnout: A longitudinal. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, 60: 144-152.
  13. Mane, A.S.D. Establishing Psychological Safety in Teams and the Role of Vulnerability and Inclusive Leadership. Master of Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University. 2019.
  14. Maynard, M.T., Gilson, L.L., Mathieu, J.E. Empowerment– fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 2012, 38 (4): 1231-1281.
  15. Mohammadian, B., Zarei matin, H., Babashahi, B., Yazdani, H. Understanding the Formation Process of Humility-Based Leadership in Business Using Meta Synthesis Approach. Journal of Transformation Management, 2018, 9(18): 24-45. (Persian).
  16. Morrison, E.W. Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 2011, 5(1): 373-412.
  17. Nembhard, I.M., Edmondson, A.C. Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement effort in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2006, 27: 941-966.
  18. Nielsen, R., Marrone, J.A., Slay, H.S. A New Look at Humility: Exploring the Humility Concept and Its Role in Socialized Charismatic Leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2010, 17: 33-43.
  19. Ou, A.Y., Tsui, A.S., Kinicki, A.J., Waldman, D.A., Xiao, Z., Song, L.J. Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2014, 59(1): 34-72.
  20. Owens, B.P., Hekman, D.R. How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 2015, 42(2): 361-381.
  21. Owens, B.P., Johnson, M.D., Mitchell, T.R. Expressed humility in organizations: implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organ. Sci. 2013, 24: 1517-1538.
  22. Owens, B.P., Hekman, D.R. Modeling how to grow: an inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4): 787-818.
  23. Qi, L., Liu, B. Effects of Inclusive Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior and Team Performance: The Mediating Role of Caring Ethical Climate. Journal Frontiers in Communication, 2017, 2(8): 1-9.
  24. Randel, A.E., Galvin,B. M., Shore, L.M., Ehrhart, K.H., Chung, B.G., Dean, M.A. Inclusive leadership: realizing positive outcomes through  belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev, 2018, 28: 190-203.
  25. Rego, A., Owens, B., Leal, S., Melo, I., eCunha, M.P., Gonçalves, L. How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: a moderated mediation model. Leadersh Q, 2017, 28: 639-658.
  26. Shabanibahar, GH., Alibakhshi, M., Samadi, A. The Role of Spiritual Leadership in Empowering Employees of Sport and Youth Organization in Hamadan Province. Journal of Sport Management, 5(3): 37-52. (Persian).
  27. Ugurlu, Q.Y., Ayas, S. The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Employee Voice: The Mediation Role of Affective Commitment and Intrinsic Motivation. Journal of Business Research Turk, 2016, 8(1): 223-239.
  28. Van Dyne, L., Lepine, J. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41: 108-119.
  29. Walumbwa, F.O., Schaubroeck, J. Leader Personality Traits and Employee Voice Behavior: Mediating Roles of Ethical Leadership and Work Group Psychological Safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2009, 94: 1275-1286.
  30. Wang, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, Y. Humble Leadership, Psychological Safety, Knowledge Sharing, and Follower Creativity: A Cross-Level Investigation. Front. Psychol, 2018, 9: 1-9.
  31. Yan, Z. How to Promote Employee Voice Behavior: Analysis Based on Leadership Style Perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 2018, 10(1): 1814-1823.
  32. Zhou, F., Jim Wu, Y. How humble leadership fosters employee innovation behavior: A two-way perspective on the leader-employee interaction. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 2018, 39(3): 375-387.