ارائه مدل ارتباطی نوآوری رادیکال باشگاه های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال ایران از طریق قابلیت اشتراک و تنوع دانش با بررسی نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده تربیت بدنی/ دانشگاه ارومیه

2 دانشگاه ارومیه

10.30473/fmss.2019.46947.1963

چکیده

هدف تحقیق حاضر ارائه مدل ارتباطی نوآوری رادیکال باشگاه­های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال ایران از طریق قابلیت اشتراک و تنوع دانش با بررسی نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل کلیه عوامل اجرایی باشگاه­های خصوصی لیگ برتر فوتبال کشور در فصل97- 98 بود. تعداد نمونه­های این تحقیق با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند و تمام­شمار (جامعه برابر نمونه) تعیین شد و 242 نفر به عنوان نمونه مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. برای گردآوری داده­ها از پرسشنامه نوآوری رادیکال ترویلو و همکاران (2014)، پرسشنامه قابلیت تنوع و اشتراک دانش شادور و اسنل (2002) و پرسشنامه یادگیری سازمانی میس و سلس (2013) استفاده گردید. برای تحلیل داده­های تحقیق از مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری و نرم­افزار «اسمارت پی ال اس.3» استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که قابلیت­های اشتراک دانش و تنوع دانش در باشگاه­های فوتبال به طور مستقیم می­تواند باعث ارتقای نوآوری رادیکال شود. ضمن اینکه یادگیری سازمانی نیز بر نوآوری رادیکال تاثیر مستقیم دارد. همچنین یادگیری سازمانی بر رابطه بین قابلیت­های اشتراک و تنوع دانش با نوآوری رادیکال اثر میانجی دارد. در نتیجه باشگاه­های فوتبال کشور باید به اشتراک و تنوع دانش توجه ویژه داشته باشند تا یادگیری و به دنبال آن نوآوری رادیکال در باشگاه توسعه یابد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. Abbasi E H. Designing the Model for Commercialization of University Research Using Structural Equation Modeling- Partial Least Squares Method (SEM-PLS). Journal of Commerce. 2018; 82: 33- 65. (persian).
  2. Allameh S M, Rezaei A, Bagheri M M. The Mediating Role of Organizational Learning between Knowledge Management Success Factors and Organizational Innovation: A Conceptual Framework. MAGNT Research Report. 2014; Vol.2 (Special Issue): 771-787.
  3. Almasi S, Eydi H, Abbasi H, Zardoshtian S. The Effect of Strategic Flexibility on Entrepreneurship Through the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning (Case Study: Office of Youth and Sports West Country). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2019 summer; 6(22):101-116. (persian).
  4. Angle, H.L. Psychology and organizational innovation. In A.H. Van de Ven, H.L; 1989. P: 54.
  5. Chesbrough, H. W. The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property. California Management Review. 2003; 45(3): 33-58.
  6. Danneels, E. “The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competences,” Strategic Management Journal. 2002; 23(12): 1095–1121.
  7. Davarpanah M R. Knowledge management: a strategic factor for organizational development. Quarterly journal of Astan Quds. 2003; 6 (4): 3- 19. (persian).
  8. Eidi H, Yosefi B. Investigating the sources of income for football in the world and comparing it with soccer club in Iran. Iran Marketing Journal. 2014; 5: 1- 17. (persian).
  9. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research. 1981;18(1):39-50.
  10. Freydoni M, Jalali Farahani M. Modeling the Relationship of Knowledge Management and Empowerment with Organizational Learning in Sport and Youth Ministry of Islamic Republic of Iran. Sport Physiology & Management Investigations. 2018 autumn; 10(3): 9-22. (persian).
  11. Frishammar J, Ericsson K, Patel P C. The dark side of knowledge transfer: exploring knowledge leakage in joint R&D projects. Technovation. 2015; 41-42: 75-88.
  12. Gao Y, Li Y, Cheng M, Feng G. How does market learning affect radical innovation? The moderation roles of horizontal ties and vertical ties. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. 2017; 32(1): 57–74.
  13. GAO Y, Sheng M. Understanding Knowledge Sharing Behavior. Master’s Thesis. The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology; 2004.
  14. Kang S C, Morris S S, Snell S A. Relational Archetypes, Organizational Learning, and Value Creation: Extending the Human Resource Architecture. Academy of Management Review. 2007; 32(1): 236– 256.
  15. Keshavarzi A H, Safari S, Hamidi rad J. The Effect of Knowledge Sharing on Organizational Learning, Innovation and Performance. Prospects for public administration. 2015; 22: 103- 128. (persian).
  16. Kim S, Lee H. Employee Knowledge sharing capabilities in public & private organizations: Does organizational context matter? In Proceedings of the 38th; 2005.
  17. Li D, Eden L, Hitt M A, Ireland R D. Friends, acquaintances, or strangers? Partner selection in R&D alliances. Academy of Management Journal. 2008; 51 (2): 315-334.
  18. Lichtenthaler U. Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes. Academy of Management Journal. 2009; 52(4): 822–846.
  19. Maes J, Sels S. SMEs’ Radical Product Innovation: The Role of Internally and Externally Oriented Knowledge Capabilities. Journal of Small Business Management. 2013; 1- 23. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12037
  20. Mesbahi Jahromi N, Adibzade M. Impact of knowledge management system on organizational innovation (moderating role of organizational learning). Knowledge Studies. 2015; 2(5): 25- 43. (persian).
  21. Mir Kamali M, Lotfi A, Babaei M M. The Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Attitude toward Organizational Innovation in Amol University of Technology. Knowledge Studies. 2018; 4 (14): 81- 96. (persian).
  22. Mohammadi Hoseini A, Amine Bedokhti A, Jamshidi L. The Role of Organizational Learning in Enhancement the Innovation Performance. 2014; 2 (4): 84-95. (persian).
  23. Mohammadi Moghadam Y, Vali Asl J, Abedi M. Examining the Role of Knowledge Sharing on the Organizational Learning Process, Regarding the Mediating Effect of Technology and Social Interaction in Pension Fund of Iranian Oil Industry. Human Resource Management in Oil Industry. 2016; 7 (28) :147-171. (persian).
  24. Neeliah H, Seetanah B. Does human capital contribute to economic growth in Mauritius?. European Journal of Training and Development. 2016 May 3; 40(4):248-61.
  25. Padash, D. Soltan Hussein,I. Khabiri M & Fathi, S. Identifying and prioritizing management and executive affecting privatization in sport clubs using AHP. International Conference on Science and Football. national football academy. 2009; 16-20. (persian).
  26. Pajohesh Jahromi A. Social Media: A Tool for Open Innovation in Small and Medium. Social Media. 2017; 28 (4): 149- 188. (persian).
  27. Pitts B G, Stotlar D K. Fundamentals of Sport Marketing. Fitness Information Technology: USA; 2007.
  28. Ramazani R. Economics and Investment in Sport: A Case Study of Football. Physical Education Organization; 2008. (persian).
  29. Ritala P, Husted K, Olander H, Michailova S. External knowledge sharing and radical innovation: the downsides of uncontrolled openness. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JKM-05-2017-0172.  
  30. Rodrigues L, Desai P. Knowledge sharing practices in KM: a case study in Indian software subsidiary. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice. 2005; 6(2): 83-90.
  31. Salimi G. Designing and explaining the knowledge sharing model at Tehran's public universities. Ph.D. thesis. Shahid Beheshti University; 2012. (persian).
  32. Shadur M A, Snell S A. Knowledge Management Strategies, Human Resources, and Firm Innovation: An Empirical Study of Australian Firms in Knowledge Intensive Industries,” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO. 2002 August: 9–14.
  33. Shokri Z, Kheirgoo M. The Role of Learning in Organizational Innovation. Tadbir. 2009; 212: 45- 48. (persian).
  34. Simao L, Franco M. External Knowledge Sources as Antecedents of Organizational Innovation in Firm Workplaces: A Knowledge-based Perspective. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2018; 22 (2): 237- 258.
  35. Slater S F, Mohr J J, Sengupta S. Radical product innovation capability: literature review, synthesis, and illustrative research propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2014; 31(3): 552-566.
  36. Sulaiman S, Ariffin M K A, Esmaeilian G R, Faghihi K, Baharudin B T H T. Customer Knowledge Management Application in Malaysian Mobile Service Providers. Procedia Engineering. 2011; 15: 3891-3895.
  37. Tabarsa N, Sarvari Eshliki Z, Ghazi Hoseini M. The Relationship between Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Innovation, National Conference of Entrepreneurial University, Babolsar, Mazandaran; 2013. (persian).
  38. Talebi K. Incremental innovation versus radical innovation. Culture of management. 2006; 4 (13): 113- 130. (persian).
  39. Thornhill S. Knowledge, Innovation and Firm Performance in High- and Low Technology Regimes. Journal of Business Venturing. 2006; 21(5): 687–703.
  40. Troilo G, De Luca L M, Atuahene-Gima K. More Innovation with Less? A Strategic Contingency View of Slack Resources, Information Search, and Radical Innovation. J PROD INNOV MANAG. 2014; 31(2): 259–277.
  41. Trott P, Hartmann D. Why open innovation s old wine in new bottles”, International Journal of Innovation Management. 2009; 13 (4): 715-736.
  42. Xu J, Houssin R, Caillaud E, Gardoni M. Macro process of knowledge management for continuous innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2010; 14: 573-591.
  43. Yaghoubi M, Karimi S, Javadi M, Nikbakht A. A Correlation Study on Organization Learning and Knowledge Management in Staffs in Selected Hospitals of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. jha. 2011; 13 (42) :65-75. (persian).
  44. Yang C, Chen L. On Using Organizational Knowledge Capabilities to Assist Organizational Learning In Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. Pittsburgh: Springer. 2010; 4: . 301- 319.