مطالعات مدیریت رفتار سازمانی در ورزش

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

مدل یابی تاثیر رهبری خدمتگزار و توزیعی بر رفتار‌های پویای شغلی و ارتقاء عملکرد سازمانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار دانشگاه تهران

2 دانشگاه مازندران

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر مدل‌یابی تاثیر رهبری خدمتگزار ‌و توزیعی بر رفتار‌های پویای شغلی و‌ ارتقاء عملکرد سازمانی کارکنان وزارت ورزش و جوانان بود. روش تحقیق توصیفی از نوع همبستگی، از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش گردآوری داده ها از نوع پیمایشی بود. جهت مطالعه رهبری خدمتگزار، رهبری توزیعی، رفتارهای پویای شغلی و عملکرد سازمانی ابتدا پژوهش‌های موجود درمنابع اطلاعاتی و کتابخانه‌ایی مطالعه و پس از چندین جلسه مشاوره و بررسی؛ عوامل موثر شناسایی شد و در قالب ‌پرسشنامه و مدل مفهومی پژوهش در دو مرتبه بصورت روش دلفی به نظر سنجی خبرگان گذاشته شد. بطوریکه پرسشنامه‌ای در قالب 9 سوال برای رهبری خدمتگزار، 6 سوال برای رهبری توزیعی، 7 سوال برای رفتار‌های پویای شغلی و 5 سوال برای عملکرد سازمانی در حوزه ورزش تنظیم و تدوین شد. برای تحلیل سوالات از مدل سازی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. نتایج برازش مدل (91/0AGFI=، 90/0GFI=، 91/0CFI=، 92/0TLI=، 94/0NFI=) نشان از مناسب بودن مدل داشت. همچنین نتایج تحلیل مسیر نیز تاثیر رهبری خدمتگزار و رهبری توزیعی را بر رفتار‌های پویای شغلی و عملکرد سازمانی تایید کرد. دانش حاصل از این پژوهش به مدیران و برنامه‌ریزان سازمان‌های ورزشی کمک می‌کند تا برنامه‌های ارتقاء عملکرد سازمان را با توسعه رفتارهای خاص رهبری مورد توجه قرار دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling the impact of transformational and distributive leadership on improving organizational performance ( Youth and Sports General Administration of Tehran Province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Majid Jalali Farahani 1
  • Masoud Freydoni 2

1 University of Tehran

2 Mazandran

چکیده [English]

The main purpose of the present study was to model the effect of service and distribution leadership on dynamic job behaviors and enhance the organizational performance of the staff of the Ministry of Sports and Youth.The research method was descriptive correlational, in terms of target and in terms of data collection method was survey type. In order to study servant leadership, distributed leadership, dynamic job behaviors and organizational performance. Firstly, existing research in informational and library resources was studied and after several consultation and review sessions, effective factors were identified and in the form of a questionnaire and a conceptual model of the research, two times as Delphi method, the experts' survey was laid. A questionnaire was developed in the form of 9 questions for servant leadership, 6 questions for distributed leadership, 7 questions for dynamic job behaviors and 5 questions for organizational performance. Structural equations modeling was used to analyze questions.دThe fit model results (NFI=0.94, TLI=0.92, CFI=0.91, GFI=0.90, AGFI=0.91) indicate that the model is suitable. Also, the results of path analysis confirmed the effect of service leadership and distributed leadership on dynamic job behavior and organizational performance. The knowledge gained from this research helps managers and planners of sports organizations to focus on enhancing organizational performance through the development of specific leadership behaviors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Servant Leadership
  • Distributed Leadership
  • Organizational Performance
  • Sports Managers
مراجع
  1. Azevedo, S.G. Carvalho, H. Machado, V.C. The Influence of Green Practices on Supply Chain Performance: A Case Study Approach. Transportation Research Part E.2011. 47. Pp: 850-871.
  2. Bakhsh, A. Eydi, H. Abbasi, H. Analyze Relationship between Organizational Forgetting and Agility with Organizational Performance (case study: Yoths and Sport Ministry). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2015. 2(5). Pp: 11-20. [Persian]
  3. Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. The development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2012. 80, 173 – 186.
  4. Bateman TS, Crant JM. Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations. Business­ Horizons. 1999. 42(3): 63-70.
  5. Bateman, T. S., & Crant, M. J. The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates summary. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1993. 14, 103-119.
  6. Bindl, U., & Parker, S. K. Feeling good and performing well? Psychological engagement and positive behaviors at work. In: S. Albrecht (ed.) Handbook of employee engagement: perspectives, issues, research and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011. 385-398.
  7. Chang, H.. A study of the relationshipsbetween distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954. 2014. 31(5): 491_515.
  8. Crant JM. Proactive Behavior in Organizations. J Manag. 26(3). pp: 435-62.
  9. Dennis, R.S. Servant leadership theory: Development of the servant leadership theory assessment instrument. A Dissertation presented in Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. 2004.
  10. Engel-Silva, M. The role of distributed leadership in quality educational organizations. Californian: University of California. Unpublished master’s thesis. 2009.
  11. Garcia-Morales, V. J. Jimenez-Barrionuevo, M. M. Gutierrez-Gutierrez, L. Transformational Leadership Influence on Organizational Performance through Organizational Learning and Innovation. Journal of Business Research. 65(7). 1040-1050.
  12. Gronn, P. Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership, Educational Management and Administration, 2000. 28(3). Pp: 317-38.
  13. Halbesleben, J. R. B. A meta-analysis of work engagement: Relationships with burnout,demands, resources and consequences. In: A.B, Bakker & M.P, Leiter (eds) Work Engagement: A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research. New York: Psychology Press 2010. Pp: 102- 117.
  14. Harris, A. Distributed knowledge and knowledge creation, in Leithwood, K., Mascall, B. and Strauss, T. (Eds), Distributed Leadership According to the Evidence, Routledge, NewYork.
  15. Horsman, J. H. Perspectives of servant leadership and spirit in organization. A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree doctor of philosophy, Gonzaga University. 2001.
  16. Humphreys, J. H. Contextual implications for transformational and servant Leadership: a historical investigation. Management Decision, 43(10),  pp:1410 – 1413.
  17. Iles­, P. Feng, Y. Distributed leadership, knowledge and information management and team performance in Chinese and Western groups. Journal of Technology Management in China. 2001. 6 (1) pp: 26-42.
  18. Koene, B. A. S. A. L. W. Vogelaar J. L. Soeters, Leadership effects on organizational climate and financial performance: Local leadership effect in chain The Leadership Quarterly.­2002. 13(3). pp: 193-215.
  19. Mascall, B. Straus, T. Sacks, R. The relationship between distributed leadership and teachers’ academic optimism. Journal of Educational Administration, 2008. 46(2), 214-228.
  20. Moharramzadeh, M. Fattahi, H. Kashef, M. The Investigating Relationship between servant leadership With intellectual capital with test the role of mediator of organizational socialization mong the staff departments of Youth and Sports West Azerbaijan province.­Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2016. 3(10). Pp: 21-30. [Persian]
  21. Osborn, R.N. & Marion, R. Contextual leadership, transformational leadership and the performance of international innovation seeking alliances. Leadership Quarterly. 2009. 20(2). pp: 191-206.
  22. Patterson, K. Servant leadership: A Theorical Model. A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Doctor of Philosophy. Regent University. 2005.
  23. Rus, C.L. Ranas, G & Baban, A. An analysis of environmental changes, resources and performance: an internal police organization perspective", Procedia- social and Behavioral, 2012. 33. Pp: 727-731.
  24. Seibert, S. E. Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. What do proactive people do? A longitudinal modelm linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 2001. 54, 845-874.
  25. Skakon, J. Nielsen, K. Borg, V. Guzman, J. Are leaders’ wellbeing, behaviors and style associated with the affective wellbeing of their employees? A systematic review of three decades of research. Work & Stress 24 147139. 2010.
  26. Spillane, J.P. Camburn, E.M. Stitziel Pareja, A. Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s work day”, Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2001. 6(1). Pp: 103-25.
  27. Tarmina Robret and H. Gao, J. identifying acceptable performance appraisal criteria : an international perspective, Asia pacific Journal of Human recourse. 2009. 17 (1) P:102-125
  28. Timperley, H. Distributed leadership: developing theory from practice, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2005. 37(4). Pp: 395- 420.
  29. Waal A. The Characteristics of a high performance Accessed from www.Andrewdewaal.nl. 2010.
  30. Winston, B.. Be a leader for God’s sake, regent university-school of leadership studies, Virginia Beach, VA. 2002.
  31. Young-Chang, Yoo; Byung-Sup, Cho; Ju-M, An "The Effects of Golf Instructors' Servant Leadership on Creativity Behavior and Innovative Behavior. Korea Coaching Development Center", Journal of Coaching Developmet. 2011 13(1) pp: 67-76.
مطالعات مدیریت رفتار سازمانی در ورزش
دوره 7، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 25
اردیبهشت 1399
صفحه 25-36
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار