نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی،دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران،ایران.

10.30473/fmss.2026.76534.2690

چکیده

با توجه به اهمیت منابع انسانی در سازمان‌ها، شناخت عوامل مؤثر در کاهش ترک شغل، به‌ویژه سبک‌های رهبری مثبت و نقش میانجی تاب‌آوری روانی، اهمیت زیادی دارد. این پژوهش به مدل‌سازی تأثیر سبک‌های رهبری مثبت بر قصد ترک شغل با میانجی‌گری تاب‌آوری روان‌شناختی در سازمان‌های ورزشی ایران می‌پردازد. با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای و با استفاده از پرسشنامه‌های استاندارد رهبری خدمتگزار لیدن و همکاران (2014) و پرسشنامه رهبری اصیل ادراک شده والومبوا و همکاران (۲۰۰۸) پرسشنامه رهبری تحول‌آفرین سیسوانتو استفاده شد. همچنین برای مقیاس تاب‌آوری از پرسشنامه تاب‌آوری اسمیت و همکاران (۲۰۰۸) و برای تمایل به ترک کار کارمندان از پرسشنامه قصد ترک کار مقیمی در کارمندان (1398) استفاده شده است. روایی پرسشنامه‌ها توسط استادان و متخصصان این حوزه تأیید شده است و پایایی پرسشنامه‌ها از روش آلفای کرونباخ اندازه‌گیری شد. پژوهش حاضر از نوع کمی و مقطعی بود که نمونه پژوهش در آن ۳۸۷ کارمند از سازمان‌های منتخب به صورت تمام شمار بودند. در قسمت آمار توصیفی از نمودار، جداول، میانگین، فراوانی و درصد استفاده خواهد شد. در قسمت آمار استنباطی از آزمون تحلیل مسیر و معادلات ساختاری استفاده شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که رهبری خدمتگزار (β = -0.278، p < 0.05 )، رهبری تحول‌آفرین (β = -0.287، p < 0.05) و رهبری اصیل (β = -0.302، (p < 0.05تأثیر منفی بر قصد ترک شغل دارند. علاوه‌بر این، تأثیر تاب‌آوری روان‌شناختی بر قصد ترک شغل نیز منفی است (β = -0.736، p < 0.05). همچنین نتایج تجزیه و تحلیل تأیید می‌کند که تاب‌آوری روان‌شناختی واسطه تأثیر رهبری خدمتگزار (β = -0.209، p < 0.05)، رهبری تحول‌آفرین (β = -0.183، p < 0.05) و رهبری اصیل (β = -0.160، p < 0.05) بر قصد ترک شغل می‌باشد

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Modeling the Impact of Positive Leadership Styles on Turnover Intention Through the Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience in Iranian Sports Organizations

نویسنده [English]

  • sara seraj

Assistant Professor, Department of Sports Management, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction                                  
Employee turnover intention is one of the most significant challenges faced by modern organizations, particularly in dynamic and high-pressure environments such as sports organizations. Employees in these contexts are often exposed to high levels of stress, demanding workloads, and continuous interpersonal interactions, which increase the likelihood of burnout and turnover intention. Therefore, identifying factors that can effectively reduce turnover intention is crucial for organizational sustainability.
This study investigates the impact of positive leadership styles—including servant leadership, transformational leadership, and authentic leadership—on turnover intention, with a particular focus on the mediating role of psychological resilience. Psychological resilience refers to the capacity of individuals to adapt to stressful conditions and recover from adversity, often emerging stronger from such experiences (Southwick et al., 2023; Masten, 2021).
The theoretical framework of this research integrates three prominent theories: Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) theory (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995), Conservation of Resources (COR) theory (Hobfoll, 1989), and the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) model (Demerouti et al., 2021). These frameworks collectively explain how leadership behaviors, psychological resources, and job conditions interact to influence employee outcomes such as turnover intention.
 
Methodology
This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional, and applied research design. The statistical population consisted of employees working in selected Iranian sports federations, representing various domains such as martial arts, aquatic sports, public sports, and medical sports organizations. A total of 400 questionnaires were distributed, and 387 valid responses were analyzed.
Standardized instruments were used for data collection, including:
Servant Leadership Scale (Liden et al., 2014), Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (Walumbwa et al., 2008), Transformational Leadership Questionnaire (Bass & Avolio, 2004), Psychological Resilience Scale (Smith et al., 2008), Turnover Intention Scale (Moghimy, 2019)
All variables were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. Reliability was confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.76 to 0.90, indicating strong internal consistency.
Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SPSS 27 and AMOS 26, allowing for the examination of both direct and indirect relationships among variables.
Results
The findings of the study provide strong empirical support for the proposed model:
1.Impact of Leadership Styles on Psychological Resilience
All three leadership styles demonstrated significant positive effects on psychological resilience:Servant leadership (β = 0.284), Transformational leadership (β = 0.256), Authentic leadership (β = 0.214)  These results indicate that supportive and ethical leadership behaviors contribute to strengthening employees’ psychological capacities.

Direct Effects on Turnover Intention

Each leadership style had a significant negative effect on turnover intention: Servant leadership (β = -0.278), Transformational leadership (β = -0.287), Authentic leadership (β = -0.302), Psychological resilience also showed a strong negative relationship with turnover intention (β = -0.736), suggesting that resilient employees are less likely to leave their jobs.

Mediating Role of Psychological Resilience

The results confirmed that psychological resilience plays a significant mediating role:Servant leadership → resilience → turnover intention (β = -0.209), Transformational leadership → resilience → turnover intention (β = -0.183), Authentic leadership → resilience → turnover intention (β = -0.160)
This suggests that leadership styles reduce turnover intention partly by enhancing employees’ resilience.

Model Fit

The structural model demonstrated a good fit with the data (CFI = 0.962, RMSEA = 0.054), confirming the validity of the conceptual framework.
 
Discussion
The findings are consistent with previous research and theoretical perspectives. From the COR theory, leadership styles act as valuable social resources that enhance employees’ psychological resilience and help them cope with stress (Hobfoll, 1989; Bai & Bai, 2024)
From the LMX theory, high-quality leader–employee relationships increase trust, commitment, and job satisfaction, thereby reducing turnover intention (Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995; Arnold et al., 2015)
Furthermore, the JD-R model explains the strong negative impact of resilience on turnover intention, as resilience functions as a personal resource that buffers the effects of job demands and prevents burnout (Demerouti et al., 2021; Xanthopoulou et al., 2023).
The stronger mediating effect observed for servant leadership may be attributed to its people-oriented nature, which emphasizes employee well-being, growth, and empowerment (Liden et al., 2014; Jakada, 2025).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that positive leadership styles significantly reduce turnover intention, both directly and indirectly through psychological resilience. The integration of LMX, COR, and JD-R theories provides a comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying these relationships.
From a practical standpoint, sports organizations should invest in leadership development programs that emphasize positive leadership behaviors and foster a supportive work environment that enhances employee resilience.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychological Resilience
  • Positive Leadership Styles
  • Turnover Intention
  • Sports Organizations
  • Iran
  1. Tian, Y., & Guo, Y. How does transformational leadership relieve teacher burnout: The role of self-efficacy and emotional intelligence. Psychological Reports, 2024, 127(2), 936–956.
  2. Liu, R., Menhas, R., & Saqib, Z. A. Does physical activity influence health behavior, mental health, and psychological resilience under the moderating role of quality of life? Frontiers in Psychology, (2024), 15, 1349880.
  3. Bai, C., & Bai, B.. Personal strength use and job satisfaction in Chinese nurses: The mediating roles of basic psychological needs satisfaction and resilience. International Nursing Review, 2024,71(3), 580–587.
  4. Farahani ,A., Mohammadi Raoof ,M. shajie ,R., Maleki,A . Comparative Study of Sport Governance status in Iran and Selected Countries. Applied Research Sport Management,2020,9(1),75-96. doi: 30473/arsm.2020.7097. (In Persian)
  5. Ren, X., Cai, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, O.. A systematic review of parental burnout and related factors among parents. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24(1), 376.
  6. Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Peeters, M. C., & Breevaart, K. New directions in burnout research. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2021,30(5),686–691
  7. Kanste, O., Kyngäs, H., & Nikkilä, J. The relationship between multidimensional leadership and burnout among nursing staff. Journal of Nursing Management, 2007, 15(7), 731–739
  8. Arnold, K. A., Connelly, C. E., Walsh, M. M., & Martin Ginis, K. A.. Leadership styles, emotion regulation, and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2015, 20(4), 481
  9. Hobfoll, S. E. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 1989, *44*(3), 513–524. doi:10.1037/0003066X.44.3.513
  10. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly. 1995;6(2):219-247.

doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5

  1. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309-328.doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115
  2. Kim, K. Y., & Liden, R. C. CEO servant leadership and organizational profitability: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior. ,2025, 46(6):833-849.
  3. Jakada, M. B.. Effect of servant leadership on lecturers’ attitudinal and behavioral loyalty in Nigeria: Conservation of resource theory perspective. International Journal of Educational Management,2025, 39(1), 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., & Fischbach, A. Work engagement among employees facing job demands: The role of transformational leadership and personal resources. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2023, 28 (2),123–135.
  5. Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. Does teacher burnout affect students? A systematic review of its association with academic achievement and student-reported outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 2021, *105*, 101714.doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101714
  6. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M.. Multifactor leadership questionnaire (TM), 2004, Mind Garden, Inc.
  7. Toulab,M., Farahani,A., Ghorbani Ghahfarokhy,L. Rezaei Soufi,M. Designing an organizational coaching model in sports organizations with the approach of empowering human resources. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies,2025,12(2),78-92. (In Persian).doi:10.30473/fmss.2025.72591.2637. (In persian)
  8. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J.. Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 2008,*34*(1),89–126. doi:10.1177/0149206307308913
  9. Greimel, N. S., Kanbach, D. K., & Chelaru, M.. Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature review and avenues for further research. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,2023, 8(2), 100351.
  10. Chen, J. K., & Sriphon, T.. Authentic leadership, trust, and social exchange relationships under the influence of leader behavior. Sustainability, 2022, 14(10), 5883.
  11. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, *57*(5), 1434–1452. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0034
  12. Mahon, D. Systematic review of servant leadership and burnout. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 2024, 28(4), 326–344.