مطالعات مدیریت رفتار سازمانی در ورزش

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اثرتصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی بر رفتار جستجوی بازخورد با نقش میانجی مالکیت روانشناختی (مطالعه موردی: کارشناسان وزارت ورزش و جوانان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار دانشگاه کاشان

2 عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد آزادشهر

3 استادیار مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

4 کارشناس ارشد مدیریت ورزشی

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف بررسی اثر تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی که از مورد توجه ترین موضوعات معاصر مدیریت بویژه مدیریت رفتار سازمانی است؛ بر رفتار جستجوی بازخورد کارشناسان وزارت ورزش و جوانان با نقش میانجی مالکیت روانشناختی انجام شد. پژوهش حاضر توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی و از نظر هدف کاربردی است. 168 نفر از کارشناسان مذکور به صورت تصادفی ساده به عنوان نمونه تحقیق انتخاب و پرسش‌‌نامه‌ 19 سوالی تحقیق، در بین آنها توزیع شد. برای تجزیه و تحلیل توصیفی داده ها نرم افزار اس.پی.ای.ای نسخه 22 و برای الگوسازی روابط میان متغیرها، معادلات ساختاری به روش حداقل مربعات جزئی با کمک نرم افزار اسمارت پی.‌ال.‌اس نسخه‌ی 3 مورد استفاده قرار گرفت.
نتایج تحقیق نشان داد که اثر تصمیم‌گیری مشارکتی بر رفتار جستجوی بازخورد و مالکیت روانشناختی اثری مثبت و معنادار است. همچنین مالکیت روانشناختی اثری مثبت و معنادار بر رفتار جستجوی بازخورد داشت. با توجه به مقدار آماره بدست آمده از آزمون سوبل نقش میانجی متغیر مالکیت روانشناختی و اثر غیر مستقیم تصمیم گیری مشارکتی بر رفتارجستجوی بازخورد تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

مراجع
  1. Allen DG, Shore LM, Griffeth RW. The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process, Journal of Management. 2003; 29: 99–118.
  2. Anseel F, Beatty AS, Shen W, Lievens F, Sackett PR. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Management. 2015; 41(1): 318–348.
  3. Ashford SJ. Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource Perspective. Acad Manage J. 2017;29(3):465-87.
  4. Ashford SJ, Blatt R, VandeWalle D. Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations, Journal of Management. 2003; 29: 773–799.
  5. Auh S, Menguc B, Imer P, Uslu A. Frontline Employee Feedback-Seeking Behavior: How Is It Formed and When Does It Matter? Journal of Service Research. 2019;22(1):44-59.
  6. Bhuiyan MH. Employee Participation in Decision Making in RMG sector of Bangladesh: Correlation with Motivation and Performance. Journal of Business and Technology. 2010; 5(2): 122-132.
  7. Chen Z, Lam W, Zhong JA. Leader–Member Exchange and Member Performance: A New Look at Individual-Level Negative Feedback-Seeking Behavior and Team-Level Empowerment Climate. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007; 92: 202-212.
  8. Chen Z, Zhu J, Zhou M. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015; 100: 511–521.
  9. Coch L, French JRP. Overcoming Resistance to Change. Human Relations. 1948;1(4):512-532.
  10. Crommelinck M, Anseel F. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behaviour:A literature review. Medical Education. 2013; 47: 232–241.
  11. Dahling J, O’Malley AL, Chau SL. Effects of feedback motives on inquiry and performance. J.Manag. Psychol. 2015; 30: 199–215.
  12. Davari A, Rezazadeh A. Structural Equation Modeling with PLS 1 nd ed. Tehran. Jahade Daneshgahi. 2013. [Persian]
  13. Fadakar Armita, Naghshbandi SS, Baqerian Farahabadi M.The effect of Cultural Capital Dimensions on the Turnover Intention in the Employees of Ministry of Sport and Youth; the Mediator Effect of Organizational Anomie. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2019; 6(23): 11-21. [Persian]
  14. Gollan PJ, Wilkinson A. Contemporary developments in information and consultation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2007; 18(7): 1133-1144.
  15. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Chapter 6, Azar, Adel.,& Gholamzadeh, Rasoul. book review and translation: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), Tehran, Negah Danesh Publications. 2015 [Persian]
  16. Han TS, Chiang HH, Chang A. Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations, The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2010; 21(12): 2218-2233.
  17. Jalali Farahani M, Goodarzi S, Saberi A. The Effect of Authentic Leadership Style on the Psychological Well-being of the Employees of the Ministry of Sports and Youth with the Intermediate
    Role of Psychological Capital. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2019; 6(23): 37-48. [Persian]
  18. Janssen O, Prins J. Goal orientations and the seeking of different types of feedback Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2007; 80: 235–249.
  19. Khandakar M.S.A, Huq K, Sultana S. Perception of Employees Regarding Participation in Decision Making and Problem Solving: A study On Different Branches of Banks in Dhaka City. ABC Research Alert. 2018; 6(1):77-90.
  20. Kim J, MacDuffie JP, Pil FK. Employee voice and organizational performance: Team versus representative influence. Human Relations. 2010; 63(3): 371-394.
  21. Kuye LO, Sulaimon AHA. Employee Involvement in Decision Making and Firms Performance in the Manufacturing Sector in Nigeria. Serbian Journal of Management. 2011; 6 (1): 1–15.
  22. Lam SSK, Chen XP, Schaubroeck J. Participative decision making and employee performance in different cultures: The moderating effects of allocentrism/idiocentrism and Academy of Management Journal. 2002; 45: 905–914.
  23. Lee Y, Kim J. Cultivating employee creativity through strategic internal communication: the role of leadership, symmetry, and feedback seeking behaviors. Public Relat. Rev. 2021; 47:101998.
  24. Liu J, Wang H, Hui C, Lee C. Psychological ownership: How having control matters. Journal of Management Studies. 2012; 49: 869–895.
  25. Michiel C, Frederik A. Understanding and encouraging feedback-seeking behavior: a literature review. Med. Educ. 2013; 47: 232–24.
  26. Mohammadi, Beshlideh, K. Relationship between Proactive Personality, Conscientiousness and Feedback Seeking Mediated by Supervisor Perceived Support, Modern psychological research. 2017;11(44): 159-179. [Persian]
  27. Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology. 2003; 7: 84-107.
  28. Pierce JL, Kostova T, Dirks KT. Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations, Acad Manag Rev.2001;26(2): 298-310.
  29. Qian J, Lin XS, Chen GZX. Authentic leadership and feedback-seeking behaviour: An examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Journal of Management & Organization. 2012; 18: 286–299.
  30. Qian J, Lin X, Han ZR, Tian B, Chen GZ, Wang H. The impact of future time orientation on employees’ feedback-seeking behavior from supervisors and co-workers: The mediating role of psychological ownership. Journal of Management & Organization. 2015;21(3):336–49.
  31. Qian J, Wang B, Han Z, Song B. Ethical Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange and Feedback Seeking:mA Double-Moderated Mediation Model of Emotional Intelligence and Work-Unit Structure. Front. Psychol. 2017; 8:1174.
  32. Rousseau DM, Shperling Z. Pieces of Action: Ownership and the Changing Employment Relationship, Academy of Management Review. 2003; 28: 553–570.
  33. Seyed Abbaszadeh Mir Mohammad , Amani Sari Baglo Javad , Heiman Khezri Azar.Qasem Pashavi. An introduction to equating structural equations by PLS method and its application in behavioral sciences, 1 nd ed. Urmia University. 2012,159.
  34. Tannenbaum AS, Cooke R.A. Control and Participation, Journal of Contemporary Business. 1974; 3(4): 35–46.
  35. Tsui AS, Ashford SJ. Adaptive Self-regulation: A process view of managerial effectiveness. 1994;Journal of Management. 20(1): 93-121.
  36. VandeWalle D, Ganesan S, Challagalla GN and Brown SP. An integrated model of feedback seeking behavior: Disposition, context and cognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000; 85: 996–1003.
  37. Vroom VH. Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley & Sons, 1964
  38. Wilkinson A. Empowerment, Personnel Review. 1998; 27: 40–56.
  39. Wilkinson A, Gollan PJ, Marchingtion M. The Oxford Handbook of Participation in Organizations, Oxford: Blackwell. 2010.
  40. Williamson MG. The Effects of Expanding Employee Decision Making on Contributions to Firm Value in an Informal Reward Environment. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2008; 25 (4): 1184-1209.
  41. Wu CH, Parker S K, de Jong JPJ. Feedback seeking from peers: A positive strategy for insecurely attached team-workers. Human Relations. 2014; 67: 441–464.
  42. Xiaoyan Li, Qian J. Stimulating Employees' Feedback-seeking Behavior: The Role of Participative Decision Making,  Social Behavior and Personality. 2016; 44(1): 1–8.
  43. Yoerger M, Crowe J, Allen JA. Participate or else!: The effect of participation in decision-making in meetings on employee engagement. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 2015; 67(1): 65–80.
  44. Zanoni P, Janssens M. Minority employees engaging with (diversity) management: An analysis of control, agency, and micro-emancipation. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies. 2007; 44: 1371–1397.
  45. Zhang X, Qian J, Wang B, Jin Z, Wang J, Wang Y. Leaders’ Behaviors Matter: The Role of delegation in Promoting Employees’ Feedback-Seeking Behavior. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8:1-10.
مطالعات مدیریت رفتار سازمانی در ورزش
دوره 8، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 31
آبان 1400
صفحه 73-84
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار